The Supreme Court on Saturday said that the Ram Janmabhoomi was not a juristic person while pronouncing its verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit. The Supreme Court added that the law must stand apart over politics, religion, and beliefs. A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court is pronouncing the verdict on Ayodhya land dispute case.
Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, who read out the unanimous Ayodhya verdict by the top court’s Constitution Bench in favor of Ram Lalla Virajman, which represents the child deity, said the 2.77-acre plot would remain in custody of the official receiver till the Centre forms a trust to take over the land.
While giving the verdict in Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit, the Supreme Court on Saturday also said, "Hindus consider Ayodhya as the birthplace of Lord Ram, they have religious sentiments. Muslims call it Babri mosque." "Faith of Hindus that Lord Ram was born here is undisputed," it added. "Ram Janmabhoomi not a juristic person," it further said.