The most anticipated Ayodhya Verdict is out

While reading out the verdict in the Ayodhya title suit case, the Supreme Court clarified that Babri Masjid was not constructed on vacant land.
The most anticipated Ayodhya Verdict is out

Pronouncing the verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit, the Supreme Court ordered that they should give disputed land to Hindus for the construction of the temple and allot alternate land to Muslims. Adding the Ayodhya site is one composite site, the court said, "Land measuring 5 acres shall be given to Sunni Waqf Board."
 
While reading out the verdict in the Ayodhya title suit case, the Supreme Court clarified that Babri Masjid was not constructed on vacant land. "There was a structure underlying the disputed structure, the underlying structure was not an Islamic structure," the five-judge Constitution bench said. CJI Ranjan Gogoi said that the entire judgment in the case is unanimous.
 
"There is evidence that Ram Chabutra, Sita Rasoi had worshipped by the Hindus before the British came." "Evidence in the records shows that Hindus were in the possession of outer court of the disputed land," it added. "Titles can't be decided on faith and belief but on claims," Supreme Court said.
 
"We've dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by Shia Waqf Board challenging the order of 1946 Faizabad Court." "Babri mosque had built by Mir Baqi. It is inappropriate for the Court to get into the area of theology," Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi added.



Top